The inalienable rights are expressly enumerated as “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”. Unfortunately it isn’t what we, the layperson, think it should be. The body charged with interpreting what those rights are just excluded abortion.
You agree it’s wrong, I agree it’s wrong, but knowing it’s wrong will be little solace to the woman sitting in a prison cell. Our interpretation of rights don’t count for a hill of beans in the legal system.
My toot was meant to justify to continue calling abortion a right.
Because fundamental rights are defended (or not...) by law, not defined.
It's still a right because it's the right thing to do. If I was in North Korea, I'd still be calling free speech a "right", too.
This is about justice, and the decision of law to deny it.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!