God I hate Mastodon's UI. Maybe modern UIs too? I have to hover over things to find out it's a link.
Except when I want to see replies to a post, I have to click the time it was posted- then it opens in a new tab? Oh, so to open it in Mastodon I have to click the ... text of the post? Clicking the space to the left of it highlights the post. Does that even do anything? They don't show URLs in my status bar?
Clicking on people's names in posts open up their toots on the very right, but it doesn't show any links on their profile or a permalink. To get that I have to ... click the same link but open it in a new tab? WTF To find my profile external link I have to post something, or click my name about my 'edit profile' in the create post column despite it having no underline.
So these are the things I vaguely know about Mastodon from trial and error. Some things that are still confusing:
Do my followers see replies I write? Do they even see that I've made more than one toot for this multi-toot thread? Are toot threads bad for this reason? Should I add (cont) to tell people I'm planning on writing more?
All of this exclusively talks about accessibility for FULLY ABLED PEOPLE. Mastodon isn't something I can even recommend to people that can't use a mouse let alone HAVE NO VISION. Tabbing through the Mastodon UI will infinitely scroll through my news feed and never let me get to notifications unless I spam it and race MY INTERNET CONNECTION.
But wait, there's third party UIs! I can't self host them, so that just means I get mitmed as a service or whatever is the cool new thing. I understand that's not the fault of the third party UIs and more the state of the Internet as a whole, but it's another hurdle. Anyway, time for my UI reviews:
Hyperspace beta: Much better accessibility. What's clickable is clear, and you can navigate using a keyboard despite that lack of hotkeys, which are needed to get back to the top from the infinite scroll. Linking to people's profiles isn't exposed as far as I can tell, which is a downside.
Pinafore: Oh my god this is so much better it's not even funny. It has hotkeys, correct focusing, EXTERNAL PROFILE LINKS. I checked the github and it turns out 'accessibility' is a goal, so no wonder. Accessibility breeds ease of use and coherency for the most part.
It's unfair to compare all the Mastodon UIs directly since they each have a different UX and thus different expectations. So here's my personal summary:
Mastodon: Broken keybinds in single column mode, multi-column layout doesn't focus properly, unclear how to get external links to profiles and toot, unclear how to view replies to a toot.
Hyperspace beta: No keybinds (hard to come back from infinite scroll), good focusing, clear how to view replies, clear how to get external toot link, unclear how to view author's page (you have to click the profile image of a person or use a hamburger menu, their name isn't highlighted), no external link to author's profile.
Pinafore: Good keybinds, good focusing, unclear how to get external links to toots, clear how to get external links to profiles, unclear how to view replies to toots. (cont
JOOKIA'S TRASH LIST OF MASTODON UI IMPROVEMENTS:
1. Add 'view externally' buttons to each toot and profile. Hyperspace beta uses an icon for this in toots.
2. Make the the name of the toot creator and booster link to their profile. Hyperspace beta hides this in a drop-down menu, though the creator avatar photo is clickable.
3. Add 'view replies' button to toots. Mastodon and Pinaform require you to click the post text instead.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!