mmh the edges are softer than expected/hoped in many testimages so far... this might become problematic in some situations
but for my current budget, this might be okey for now... currently prioritizing a proper, used 70-200, let's see what i have purchased, the seller does not respond. hoping to get what was photographed, not what was described lol
here is another shot
(reposted due to a late night error in the edit ;))
the initial pricing of canon rf lenses already is much more than it was with their ef mount versions it seems. sad.
just risked the canon 70-200 2.8L for a bit less than 800 € on ebay. in the hope to get sharper images than with the old sigma version (which i have returned already). the seller did advertise it like the oldest (2.8) version from 1995, but the bad images show IS. 🤞
"I will just prepare slides on the way to the conference"
Odd humor and very Milan - autodidactic SysAdmin and Photodude,
also very Admin of tchncs.de and @illunaminetest.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!