As far as I get the vibes from this text it does blame the user for not being the Arch Linux expert that others are.
He could warn to use it, because one does not understand the basics behind the helper, which could favor security issues, and could encourage the Newbie to learn more about it or give Links to information itself.
But the author decides to enforce a wall that separates the elitists. It's lack of will to provide help and the top-down view on people.
i can get not wanting your repo to be the aur-related-issue garbage every time a package breaks and some user [that prolly got convinced by an elitist that arch is the best] thinks you should fix it
And yea, I totally understand that someone might not want to develop FOSS anymore because everybody just expects you to fix shit with no gratification.
The paragraph doesn't help though. And...documentation is an important part of the process, for any tool.
@CobaltVelvet @patrik For example, I wouldn't call the Arch wiki good docs because it completely overloads new users with so much crap they don't really understand, it's hard to near impossible on some issues to actually figure out what is important and what isn't.
idk, maybe I have the expectation that if you write a tool, you teach people how to use it. This isn't about Arch specifically either, but about any tool.
Also I think the fact that aurman is unofficial doesn't change anything here. The entire AUR isn't really officially supported.
And yea, I can understand that the developer of aurman dropped out and stopped maintaining shit.
That notice was there before. I just re-noticed it now. And it isn't any less toxic if you view it in context...
@CobaltVelvet @patrik Regardless of context, regardless of what FOSS developers have to endure, I can fully support and understand frustration and not wanting to be support. Or being abused by people for not fixing bugs or whatever.
But that paragraph is everything that's wrong with FOSS. Because it's the same mind set that probably made the originally developer quit. And that's pretty sad...
The reason why the maintainer left and the elitist comment are unlikely related. Doesn't make the elitist comment any better...
Also, I very much doubt most elitist people are being "deliberately" elitist. Few people do even fewer things deliberately. They just do it, either justifying it to themselves somehow or just not thinking about it (i.e. "bad" people think they're "good", liberals think they're not idiots, etc... :P)
@CobaltVelvet @patrik I wouldn't call the comment "potentially elitist", I'd call it elitist bullcrap that spends more characters than a toot shitting on anyone who might run into problems with this tool. Instead of, say, linking to a guide on how to use AUR (which sucks in the arch wiki), it belittles it's users and very clearly communicates that there is an in and out group.
The author might not have thought "oh I am so elitist" while writing it, but that doesn't change it after the fact...
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!