This post makes the case that attaching a crypto currency to a protocol would ensure the long term funding of development and maintenance of the protocol.

OK. But IMO it seems like a distraction too, and rife with potential mistakes. Mistakes that could sink your protocol. Is it worth it? Maybe there are other ways?

Anyways, everything I read about the governance of crypto tells me it's a total ****-show so it's probably better to find a better solution.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!