@teleclimber Hmm, "I’m really glad Deno is here. It’s important to be able to run code that you can’t necessarily trust in an environment that limits what an attacker should do. We should have that for JS."

Wasn't that meant to be web browsers?

Anyways, best of luck!

@teleclimber Sorry if I came accross a little harsh in pointing out the irony.

I honestly do want to see a more secure sandbox for JavaScripty webapps! Hopefully our seperate efforts will help split the document Web & the apps Web, creating a better future for both!


@alcinnz I am talking about the server side of web-apps, not the client. Browsers are good sandboxes for a client, but I want give people the ability to deploy personal apps that respond to *incoming* requests on the internet.

Deno is good for that and CLI type programs, which browsers aren't suited for.

@teleclimber Ah, I get you!

I must say I'm not that pleased with browser sandboxing, but it's the status quo & they're trying to improve. I'm still curious to see what you manage to create!

@alcinnz Thank you!

Yes I see what you mean about the browser sandbox. It's fairly robust against the things it disallows, but it allows far too much.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!