I don‘t get this thing... In my opinion, there is a reason we have statues of limitation (or should have them, anyways): everyone deserves a second chance and should be able to leave bad decisions behind at some point. And, secondly, after such a long time any accusation will very often be both unprovable and unrefutable. So I don‘t see this as a showstopper...

But what I don‘t get is that his insistence never to have had a blackout after drinking too much does not seem very believable. Lying *today* should be a problem for getting promoted to the Supreme Court, no?

Sign in to participate in the conversation

One of the first Mastodon instances, there is no specific topic we're into, just enjoy your time!