my fave socials interact is when Person A says something that could be read several ways
are they asking for help? looking for sympathy? starting a convo? they just bitching?
time to put on your psychic beanie and play guess the intent!
so Person B guesses wrong and does something gauche and stupid like offer a link to the actual information A complained they can't find, allowing A to smugly, self-righteously lay into B for being a "reply guy" and "in their mentions"
agree, most people welcome positive interactions, and I think most people reply with the kind of reply they'd like to recieve based on how they interpreted the intent of the post
but there's also the problem of how an individual defines 'positive interaction' and for a non-zero number of people, that means replies that aren't just polite or well intentioned, but also comply with a set of specific, unstated parameters
which is some prime grade mind gamey bullshit
@kaia
agree, though I think ppl also make a lot of assumptions about other people based on pretty unreliable data like an avatar or a username
ex: all the anime girl avatars aren't backed by women, even if people might subconsciously respond as if to women
and I suspect some ppl imagine responses (eg answering a question when they wanted to complain) assuming the other person is responding based on info they know about themself, not what the other person actually believes them to be